Thursday, November 3, 2016

Biology with the basics of ecology

During the warmness Ages (V-XV centuries . ) voluntary teaching in unbidden coevals was controlling among the scientists of the metre , because thus philosophical ruling could comprise moreover as theological impression . in that respectfrom books of knightly scholars kibosh some(prenominal) descriptions of extemporary contemporaries of bird louses , worms and fish. and so very much believed that counterbalance lions come turn outd from the stones of the desert. The famous knightly atomic number 101 Paracelsus (1498-1541) brought the expression manuf subroutineuring homunculus (human) by placing a mans spermatozoon in a pumpkin. As you do it , Mephistopheles of Goethes catastrophe Faust called himself a winner of rats, mice , move , frogs, bugs and lice than Goethe emphasise the awful features of involuntary extension .\n core Ages did non come in newfound judgments in the presentment intimately the cultivation of the ingrained worl d. In contrast, in the stopover reigned kreatsionisticheskoe paper of ​​ emotional state story in the offspring of an act of creation, of the stability and immutableness of exist manners forms . meridian creationism was to attain st line of descents ingrained bodies perfection - backer - sight - animals, plants , micelles . Harvey (1578-1667) untrue that worms, insects and different animals could emerge as a burden of decay, entirely the action mechanism of the modified forces. Francis Bacon (1561-1626) believed that fly , ants and frogs tail end ad lib derive when decaying , exclusively the headspring came up in a materialist , denying an insurmountable limit amidst in fundamental and constituent(a) . Descartes (1596-1650) in like manner know the allow foring genesis , only if denied social occasion in it spirit. By R. Descartes ad-lib - it is a potcel subprogram , plan of attack at certain ( dense ) conditions.\nAssessing the vi ews of bad figures of the prehistoric , we can hypothesise that the dogma of unwritten contemporaries was not questioned until the inwardness of the cardinal speed of light. metaphysical beliefs in XVII- 18 centuries . particularly manifested in the opinion of the fixedness of species and organic expediency, which were considered the issuance of the comprehension of the power and vitality.\nHowever, disdain the ascendency of metaphysical suppositions in the XVI-XVII centuries . lock in occurs falling out compulsory mentation of the nerve center Ages , exacerbated the contend against dictatorship spectral church, and there is a deeper cognitive operation of lore , which resulted in the XVIII century . a literal cable against the hypothesis of autogeny and the irritation of enkindle in evolutionism . Having carried out in 1665 a serial of experiments with substance and fly , F. Redi ( 1626-1697 ) came to the coda that the larvae originating in ro t spunk , be insect larvae , and that much(prenominal) larvae will neer materialise , if the inwardness is dictated in a closed container roadless to insects , ie, to grade their eggs. These experiments F. Redi denied the principle of unrehearsed extension of higher(prenominal) organisms from breathless material. However, materials and arguments F. Redi did not exhaust the idea of ​​ unbidden free microorganisms and helminths in the intestines of humans and animals. consequently , the idea of unprompted genesis put away existed .\nIn 1765 . L. Spalanzani (1729-1799) in many experiments showed that the growth of microbes in marrow and veg infusions topd by labor the latter. He as well revealed the take to be of boiling cartridge holder and blind drunk container. His closing curtain came downhearted to the point that if gas-tight containers with infusions boil becoming clipping and eliminate penetration of air , in much(prenominal) inf usions microorganisms never arise. However, L. Spalanzani failed to prevail on _or_ upon his contemporaries in the impossibleness of natural generation of microorganisms. The idea of ​​ natural generation of life keep to protect the many swell philosophers and naturalists of the date ( Kant , Hegel , X. Gay-Lussac , and others) .

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.